 |
Health informatics with integrity. In
the health improvement and disease management industry today, there is a common concern
in that there is no standard for measuring ROI. Because of this, it is said that anybody
can make numbers say anything. At Cardium Health, we are dedicated to working together
with our customers to understand what the numbers mean and continuously raise the bar
to achieve verifiably greater results.
Our philosophy to do whatever it takes to meet or exceed our customers’ expectations
extends to the gathering, analysis, and communication of data to demonstrate real results.
Our reporting process is made up of two components:
1. Data Collection
We capture and analyze data from multiple sources including medical and pharmacy benefit
claims, physician-reported clinical histories and participant-reported behavioral and
clinical information. Our constant objective is to achieve the highest data integrity
and accuracy. Wherever possible, medical and/or pharmacy claim data is verified through
interviews with program participants and communications with their physicians. This
data is then integrated into DM
TrackSM,
the Cardium Health proprietary data management system.
2. Health Informatics
Once the rigorous process of gathering accurate data is complete, we apply computer and
statistical methods as well as customized measures developed together with our clients
to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of Cardium Health programs. Reports
are typically broken into the following three components in evaluating our health
improvement and disease management programs:
- Program Activity and Demographics: Monthly and/or annual reports highlighting
the number of candidates identified, the number of those candidates subsequently
enrolled in a program, active participation rates, demographic information related
to the age, gender, and relation of the enrolled population, and other related data.
- Clinical Metrics: Quarterly and/or annual reports depicting a variety of clinical
indicators of health risk. These measures are not directly related to key disease-specific
financial cost drivers, but are long-term predictors of potential future costs. For
example, typical clinical metrics include exercise activity, laboratory values, tobacco
use, etc. These reports are comparative in nature, displaying clinical indicators for
the participant population both prior to and subsequent to enrollment in a Cardium
Health disease management or health improvement program.
- Financial Outcomes: Quarterly and/or annual reports detailing comparative data
for key disease-specific cost drivers. These reports compare clinical “event” rates
from the baseline, which is the defined period of time prior to implementing a Cardium
Health program, to the same “event” rates following program inception. Clinical “events” are
the primary cause of high medical costs, disability costs and absenteeism. Together
with each client, we determine the events that are most likely to impact a given population
and use this as the basis for evaluating our program performance.
Future Developments
Going forward, the health improvement and disease management industry faces a fundamentally
difficult challenge to develop a standard method to measure that which did not occur
(i.e., the avoided hospitalization, disability, etc.). It’s a matter of proving
the negative.
At Cardium Health, we are never satisfied with the status quo and are committed to working
with customers in an open, transparent way to understand what the data is telling us,
and what we should do about it. It is a never-ending pursuit of clinical outcome improvement
for the individual participants we serve.
We are committed to on-going exploration of health informatics methodologies to continuously
improve our program performance. In 2005 and beyond, we will continue to find ways to
enrich our rigorous data integrity process through expanded use of medical, pharmacy,
disability, and other claim or utilization data, both in our reporting activities as
well as on-going clinical operations.
|